Experts Criticize Trump’s AI Plan for Safety Gaps

Trump Unveils AI Action Plan Amid Global Competition

President Trump announced a sweeping new artificial intelligence (AI) policy this week, aiming to position the United States as the global leader in the AI race against China. The initiative, introduced through a new government platform ai.gov, outlines a three-pronged strategy: Accelerating Innovation, Building AI Infrastructure, and Leading International Diplomacy and Security.

Trump’s unveiling of the plan came alongside a series of executive actions, including easing export restrictions on AI technology and promoting infrastructure growth to support the enormous computing needs of AI systems. The administration is also integrating AI across government agencies, including the Pentagon, and issuing directives to address perceived ideological bias in large language models.

AI Experts Warn of Safety and Policy Concerns

Despite the plan’s ambitious scope, AI experts and academics are voicing deep concerns about what they see as critical oversights. Yoshua Bengio, a Turing Award recipient and AI pioneer, warned that the competitive pressure of the U.S.-China AI race is encouraging unsafe development practices. “Intense competition can create dangerous incentives to cut corners on safety,” he stated.

These safety concerns are compounded by the administration’s cuts to research funding and restrictions on student visas, which experts argue could undermine America’s technological edge. Yolanda Gil of USC’s Viterbi School of Engineering emphasized that reducing access to international talent and funding will “reduce U.S. competitiveness in AI and all technology areas, not just in the near future but for many years to come.”

Visa Policies Threaten Talent Pipeline

One of the most pointed criticisms of the Trump administration’s AI strategy is its tightening of the F-1 visa program. Currently, 70% of full-time AI graduate students in U.S. universities are international students, many of whom are vital to the innovation ecosystem. The ongoing visa crackdowns, according to Gil and other policy experts, could cripple the industry’s ability to attract and retain global talent.

Sheila Jasanoff of Harvard’s Kennedy School added that the U.S. once thrived on openness to international ideas and people. “That achievement is in a precarious state,” she said. “Why would a talented young person wish to invest in a U.S. graduate program if there’s a risk their visa could be canceled overnight?” she asked, warning that other nations are already taking advantage of the uncertainty in American academic and research institutions.

Misalignment Between Deregulation and Innovation

Critics also point to a contradiction at the heart of Trump’s AI approach: supporting deregulation while simultaneously limiting the industry’s access to top-tier talent and fundamental research. Teddy Svoronos, a senior lecturer at Harvard, noted that “the president is deregulating the AI industry while limiting its ability to recruit the highest-quality talent from around the world.”

Svoronos expressed skepticism about the administration’s ability to foster “effective or aligned AI,” referring to AI systems designed to act in ways beneficial to humanity. While Trump’s plan emphasizes aligning AI development with U.S. interests, the absence of robust safety and ethical frameworks has left many experts uneasy.

Open-Source AI Raises National Security Concerns

Another controversial aspect of the plan is the administration’s support for open-source and open-weight AI models. While this offers potential for broad adoption across sectors, it also opens the door to malicious use by terrorist groups or adversarial states. Bengio warned that this approach could facilitate AI-enabled cyberattacks, biological threats, and loss of control over advanced AI systems.

“To realize the full benefits of these technologies,” Bengio said, “safety and innovation must go hand in hand, supported by strong technical and societal safeguards.”

Trump Defends America’s Role in AI Leadership

In his policy speech, Trump struck a nationalistic tone. “America is the country that started the AI race,” he declared. “And as president of the United States, I’m here today to declare that America is going to win it.” He emphasized that U.S. children should not live on a planet “controlled by the algorithms of the adversary’s advancing values.”

Trump praised the ingenuity of Silicon Valley, calling it “the most brilliant place on Earth,” but his critics argue that his policies undermine the very ecosystem he lauds.

Conclusion: A Future at a Crossroads

As the U.S. and China continue their high-stakes AI competition, the path forward remains fraught with challenges. Experts agree that technological dominance requires not only investment and innovation but also ethical foresight, global collaboration, and a commitment to safety.

Without these, America’s bid to lead the AI future could come at the cost of public trust, national security, and scientific integrity.


This article is inspired by content from Original Source. It has been rephrased for originality. Images are credited to the original source.

Subscribe to our Newsletter