Wall Street Faces AI-Driven Volatility Amid Profit Concerns

AI Hype Turns to Hesitation on Wall Street

For years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been a major catalyst driving the surge in stock markets, raising hopes for transformative growth and profits. However, recent months have seen a shift in sentiment as concerns mount over whether massive investments in AI will actually deliver sustainable financial returns. This growing unease has triggered turbulence across key sectors, signaling a notable departure from the exuberance that characterized the start of the year.

Market Volatility Hits AI-Linked Stocks

On Monday, prominent companies such as Visa, Mastercard, and IBM experienced sharp declines, extending a bout of volatility that has gripped AI-associated stocks. The overall market saw a modest recovery on Tuesday after new AI integrations were announced by Anthropic, which buoyed software shares. Despite these fluctuations, the benchmark S&P 500 index remains roughly flat for the year.

AI-powered coding platforms, including Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex, have rapidly advanced in their capabilities and gained popularity among software developers. These tools enable developers to create complex software products in a fraction of the time previously required, fueling both excitement and apprehension about the future of various industries.

Fears of Disruption and Economic Fallout

The latest market sell-off was sparked in part by a widely circulated Substack post from Citrini Research. The post warned of a looming stock market crash, a significant pullback in consumer spending, and widespread white-collar layoffs by 2028 as a result of unchecked AI adoption. Payment giants like Mastercard and American Express were particularly hard hit, as investors weighed the possibility of reduced spending and potential business disruption. Both companies were singled out in the Citrini analysis as especially vulnerable in an AI-driven landscape.

IBM experienced its most significant single-day drop since October 2000—an era marked by the dot-com bubble burst. Investors reacted negatively to Anthropic’s announcement that its Claude Code tool could update legacy computing languages favored by IBM, raising concerns about threats to IBM’s core maintenance and modernization services. Shares of consulting firms such as Accenture and Cognizant Technology also declined in response.

Turbulence Spreads Across Sectors

The weakness in these major stocks reverberated throughout the wider market. All three major U.S. indexes fell on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunging by over 800 points. Five of the eleven S&P 500 sectors closed in the red, led by financials and consumer discretionary, which dropped by 3.3% and 2.2% respectively.

Ironically, the same force that propelled tech sector gains over the past two years—AI—is now driving investor caution. Mona Mahajan, the head of investment strategy and asset allocation at Edward Jones, noted that investors are rapidly withdrawing from sectors perceived as particularly vulnerable to AI disruption, including financial services, real estate, transportation, and logistics. Despite the dramatic price swings, Mahajan emphasized that the fundamental operations of these companies remain largely unchanged, highlighting the speculative nature of the current market reaction.

Safe Havens and New Industry Paradigms

Not all sectors suffered amid the sell-off. The consumer staples sector, featuring companies like Walmart and Coca-Cola, attracted investors looking for stable returns in industries less likely to be upended by AI advancements.

Meanwhile, rapidly rising valuations for Anthropic and OpenAI have forced investors in diverse industries—from logistics and trucking to legal services—to confront the possibility that AI’s coding capabilities could erode traditional barriers to competition. According to Melissa Otto, head of Visible Alpha research at S&P Global, increasing capital expenditures on AI and swift technological progress are challenging established business models. She stressed that companies with intricate workflows and proprietary data stand a greater chance of weathering the so-called “AI storm.” “Data that underlies generative AI, especially when it is predictive and proprietary, can potentially give firms a significant edge,” Otto explained.

Broader Market Forces and Looking Ahead

Beyond AI, Wall Street is also grappling with geopolitical tensions, such as the potential for conflict between the U.S. and Iran, and legal uncertainties including the recent invalidation of emergency tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. Some analysts suggest that these developments could serve as a temporary distraction from persistent AI-related concerns.

Lori Calvasina, head of U.S. equity strategy research at RBC Capital Markets, noted in a client memo that investors have been preoccupied with questions about cash flow, capital expenditures, and the long-term viability of various industries in the AI era. She argued that while existential fears for sectors outside of software—like wealth management and logistics—may be overstated, shifting focus to other market topics could be beneficial for the investing community.


This article is inspired by content from Original Source. It has been rephrased for originality. Images are credited to the original source.

Subscribe to our Newsletter